• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Staff
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
  • Write for Us
  • Resource Library
    • Defense – Resource Library
    • Intelligence – Resource Library
    • Foreign Affairs – Resource Library
    • Global Security – Resource Library
    • National Security – Resource Library
    • Homeland Security – Resource Library
    • Terrorism and Counterterrorism – Resource Library
    • Writing and Critical Thinking – Resource Library
    • Professional Development – Resource Library
    • Leadership Building & Power Management – Resource Library
    • Thought Communities – Resource Library

Fulcrum Global

  • Featured Articles & Essays
  • OSINT-SITREP
  • Intelligence Briefs
  • Background Reports
  • Video Presentations
  • Podcast
  • Contributors
    • Sam Kessler
    • Brian Moody
    • Dustin Oaks
    • Cameron Grischott
    • Alyssa LeVasseur
    • Allen Cline
    • Brittany Lamon-Paredes
    • Shelomo Alfassa
    • Wayland Blue
    • Dr. Mark Kass
    • Max Daves
    • Dr. Frank Danesy
    • Dan Opstal
    • Dr. Hans C. Mumm
    • Paul Seibel
    • Carl (C.J.) Unis
    • Nabil Rahman
    • Katherine Sharp
    • Adam Roosevelt
    • Michael Maestas
    • James Weichold
  • Professional Development Program
  • Resource Library

AGENDA 2030 – NATO CHARTS ITS COURSE

July 2, 2021 by Fulcrum Global 1 Comment

By Dr. Frank C. Danesy – Contributor

On Monday, June 14, the 30 NATO Heads of State and Government met in Brussels to chart the organization’s strategy leading up to 2030 and beyond. During the meeting, the Allies reaffirmed their unity, solidarity, and cohesion and their will to open a new chapter in transatlantic relations. In a joint statement, the leaders underscored that NATO will continue to be the foundation on which the collective defense of the member states rests and the essential forum for security consultations and decisions among the NATO Allies.  The allied leaders also agreed that NATO will continue to safeguard peace, security, and stability in the entire Euro-Atlantic region based on shared values, including individual liberty, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law.

NATO Threat Assessment

During the summit, the Heads of State and Government discussed numerous threats that the NATO member states are currently facing. In their communiqué, the allied leaders most frequently cited Russia’s aggressive posture and actions as a threat to Euro-Atlantic security. Russia’s continued breach of the values, principles, trust, and commitments outlined in agreed documents that underpin the NATO-Russia relationship has caused considerable strain. Russia has designated the United States and the Czech Republic as “unfriendly countries”, which bears significance in international relations and diplomacy. Kremlin leadership has been building up its military, launching large-scale military exercises without prior notice and has deployed modern dual-capable missiles close to the border of one of the NATO member states. Russia’s frequent violations of NATO allied airspace and its military integration with Belarus – a country known for its authoritarian state leadership and human rights violations – adds to the list of concerns.

For the first time in its history, NATO has now also included China as a topic of its agenda. The NATO partners expressed concerns over China’s stated ambitions and assertive behavior, which present challenges to the rules-based international order and the Alliance’s security. China has been rapidly expanding its nuclear arsenal. Chinese leadership has been opaque about the modernization of its military and its publicly declared military-civil fusion strategy. China has been cooperating militarily with Russia and participated in Russian exercises in the Euro-Atlantic area. During the meeting, the NATO member states, nevertheless, agreed to maintain a constructive dialogue with China wherever possible.

Terrorism in all its forms and manifestations also poses a threat for all Alliance members. Both state and non-state actors challenge the rules-based international order and aim to undermine democracy.  The NATO member states are increasingly faced with cyber, hybrid, and other asymmetric threats as well as a proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Disinformation campaigns, the malicious use of increasingly sophisticated disruptive technologies, rapid advances in the space domain, and the erosion of the arms control architecture threaten NATO security. NATO Heads of State and Government also cited climate change as a threat multiplier impacting Alliance security. Finally, instabilities beyond NATO borders contribute to irregular migration and human trafficking, which are also points of concern.

Commitments and Countermeasures

In their communiqué, the Heads of State and Government reaffirmed that they see NATO’s most significant responsibility in protecting and defending NATO territories and populations against any attack and in warding off all threats and challenges that affect Euro-Atlantic security. They committed to enhance the organization’s capability to contribute to, preserve, and shape the rules-based international order. To that end, the Allied leaders agreed to maintain and further strengthen an appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional and missile defense capabilities for deterrence and defense, to enhance the Alliance’s resilience, and to “foster technological cooperation among Allies in NATO, promote interoperability and encourage the development and adoption of technological solutions to address the Alliance’s military needs.” The NATO Member States also agreed to improve the balance of sharing the costs and responsibilities of Alliance membership. Citing considerable progress that has been made in this regard since the Wales Summit seven years ago, the Allies are expected to spend 2% or more of GDP on defense. Two-thirds of the NATO member states will reach or exceed that target by 2024.

_______________________________________________________ 

Dr. Frank C. Danesy is the founder and CEO of Intelsource, a company specialized in corporate strategy, strategic intelligence, human resource management, and conflict resolution. Before his current activity, he held various high-profile managerial roles in the space sector. He is deeply familiar with space government and industry and with the politics and processes of international organizations. He holds master’s degrees in business administration, intelligence studies, and space science. His doctorate is in leadership and conflict resolution.

Want to contribute to Fulcrum Global? Click Here!


Read the full communiqué that came out of the NATO Brussels conference here.

DOWNLOAD PDF VERSION HERE – CLICK

Brussels Summit Communiqué

 

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Filed Under: Background Reports, Dr. Frank Danesy Tagged With: Brussels Conference, NATO, NATO Communique, NATO in 2030

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Teknik Industri says

    August 29, 2024 at 12:32 AM

    Why has NATO included China on its agenda for the first time, and what concerns have been raised by NATO partners regarding China’s military expansion and cooperation with Russia, despite agreeing to maintain a constructive dialogue with China?
    Greeting : Telkom University

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

E-mail Updates

Follow Us

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

More to See

Russian Threats to U.S. Space Assets – Intelligence Brief #10

May 29, 2025 By Fulcrum Global

How the War in Ukraine is Strengthening China and Weakening Russia

March 30, 2025 By Fulcrum Global

Intelligence Briefs

Russian Threats to U.S. Space Assets – Intelligence Brief #10

May 29, 2025 By Fulcrum Global Leave a Comment

China Space Threat to U.S. Assets – Intelligence Brief #9

June 20, 2024 By Fulcrum Global Leave a Comment

Iranian Relations, Cyberwar, and Trade Deals with China – Intelligence Brief #8

December 10, 2019 By Fulcrum Global Leave a Comment

LeT Terrorist Group: Pakistani Ties – Intelligence Brief #7

September 25, 2018 By Fulcrum Global 1 Comment

U.S. Space Force: Status and Geopolitical Implications – Intelligence Brief #6

August 23, 2018 By Fulcrum Global Leave a Comment

Japanese Reaction to Recent North Korea/USA Summit – Intelligence Brief #5

August 6, 2018 By Fulcrum Global Leave a Comment

ISIS Utilization of Social Media – Intelligence Brief #4

July 26, 2018 By Fulcrum Global Leave a Comment

Civil Unrest in Haiti: History Repeating – Intelligence Brief #3

July 16, 2018 By Fulcrum Global Leave a Comment

China Global Expansion Initiatives – Intelligence Brief #2

July 9, 2018 By Fulcrum Global Leave a Comment

Yemen Civil War – Intelligence Brief #1

July 2, 2018 By Fulcrum Global Leave a Comment

Footer

My Tweets

Recent Posts

  • PSYCHOLOGICAL DEFENCE AND INFORMATION INFLUENCE – A TEXTBOOK ON THEORY AND PRACTICE January 30, 2026
  • Russian Threats to U.S. Space Assets – Intelligence Brief #10 May 29, 2025
  • How the War in Ukraine is Strengthening China and Weakening Russia March 30, 2025
  • NSA Releases Internal 1982 Lecture by Computing Pioneer Rear Admiral Grace Hopper October 2, 2024
  • China Space Threat to U.S. Assets – Intelligence Brief #9 June 20, 2024
  • Annual Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community – February 5, 2024 March 11, 2024

Search

PER VIRES INGENI — Strength and Ability

 

 

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Our Staff
  • Announcements
  • Contact Us
  • Write for Us
  • Resource Library

Copyright © 2026 FULCRUM GLOBAL • All Rights Reserved